The Natural History of HPV

Infection and Cervical

Carcinogenesis

 

 

 

Mark Schiffman, MD, MPH

National Cancer Institute

 

 

Lessons Drawn From 3 NCI Cohorts

And Colleagues

Portland Kaiser Permanente (20,000+

Women receiving Pap smears)

 

Guanacaste, Costa Rica (9,000+women in

a high-risk general population)

ASCUS-LSIL triage study (5,000+women

with mildly abnormal Pap smears)

 

 

 

 

Reconsider the CNI Continuum

 

 

Surface of

Epithelium

 

 

Basal

Epithelium

Normal     LOW GRADE S.I.L.              HIGH GRADE S.I.L.

                                                   C.I.N. 1                                   C.I.N. 2                     C.I.N.   3

                        CONDY-    VERY                                MODER-      SEVERE     CARCI-                 INVASIVE               

                        LOMA-       MILD        MILD               ATE               DYS           NOMA                              CANCER

                        TOUS          DYS-         DYS-                DYS-           PLASIA      IN SITU

                       ATYPIA      PLASIA    PLASIA          PLASIA

 

 

 

 

 

NATURAL History of Cervical Carcinogenesis

 

 

 

 

 

 

Persistence

(>1 year)

 

 

Norm         Infection--------HPV         Progression        Pre       Invasion     CANCER

                 clearance          Infected                        Cancer

Cervix                               Cervix     Regression

 

 

 

 

 


                            Mild Cytologic

                             Abnormalities

 

 

 

 

 

 

HPV and Cervical Cancer

 

 

Over 100 types of HPV, over 40 genital types

Approximately 15 types associated with cervical cancer; most common 16,18,31 and 45 (focus of this talk)

Condyloma acuminatum most commonly types 6 & 11 “Benign” types include tupes 53 and 61.

HPV 16,18,31 And 45 Cause

Most Cervical Ca Worldwide

 

16

 

18

 

31

 

 

45

 

 

Ng/0th

 

% of Cancers Positive for Type

Sexual Transmission of HPV

Established

%       

Lifetime # Sex Partners

HPV 16 DNA       Seropos 16

 

 

Portland: Short  Term Follow-up of HPV 16 Among Initially Cytologically Normal Women

 

 

Out of Thousands of women typed, 61 women were found at enrollment to have HPV 16 DNA by PCR, with normal cytology and no history of previous CIN.

HPV 16 Persistence Among 61 Initially Cytologically Normal Women, Portland OR

 

         

Months

Viral Clearance

HPV 16 DNA detection drops to about ane-half

Within a year, and somewhat more by two years.

The two instances of HPV 16 persistence found uncesored at 4 years both were associated with high-grade CIN.

Clearance apparently type specific and type independent. Non-oncogenic clear faster.

Our conclusions agree with prospective data summarized by Burk recently in Papillomavirus Reports (2001;12:119-123).

 

 

 

Guanacaste, Costa Rica

We designed the Guanacaste study to examine the origins of high-grade CIN in a population without prior effective screening and treatment.

HPV testing of all specimens and histopathology  reviews of possible incident high grade endpoints are underway.

 

Guanacaste: Study Population and Baseline Screening Tests

 

Census of population: 9, 175 women underwent gynecologic screening at baseline (> 90  %  participation).

 

PCR testing of all enrollment specimens generated a cohort of 219 women infected with HPV 16, but with only low-grade or no cytologic abnormalities (prevalent CIN 2 + and cancers were censored).

 

 

Follow-up

 

v      Women were followed by repeat examinations for new cervical abnormalities. For safety, we treated and censored any evidence of CIN 2 +

 

v      For this analysis, we were able to complete repeat viral testing of the 5 – 6 year (or latest available) specimens.

 

Outcome of 219 HPV 16 infections

followed over 5 – 6 years

           

Oucome of Infection

 Regress                 Pers, NL                Pers, Abn                CIN 2            CIN 3            ICC

Persistence and Progression

 

 

Persistent HPV 16 is highly associated with progression to precancer and cancer

We now define persistence as repeat detection at 1 –2 years, recognizing that the longer HPV 16 persists, the higher the absolute risk for CIN 3 and cancer.

Co – factors include smoking, multiparity, but viral load is a complicated issue.

 

 

 

Risk for Cervical Cancer and Precancer Associated with an Abnormal Baseline Pap smear and/or a Positive HPV test over 45 months.

 

 

Pap and/or               #                     #                     Absolute                   Relative

 

 

HPV                                Women         Cases  Risk                                 Risk

 

Positive                                                                                                       (95 % CI)

 

 

No                                  17573 16                0.09

 

Yes                                 3213            102              3.2                                 35 (21- 59)

 

 

 

What About Viral Latency?

 

 

Natural history studies through 10 years of follow-up suggest that latency is not a big factor, but these studies are still too short

Latency is a theorical concern, but if cancers arise from reactivated virus, will affect screening and vaccination plans

Evidence to date suggest very low viral load is good, not a high risk.

 

Cervical Cancer Risk Factors

 

 

Age onset sexual activity (HPV)

Number of sexual partners (HPV)

Smoking (co-factor)

Very high parity (co-factor)

Compromised immune system (HIV and other immunosuppression), risk to CIN 3

LACK OF SCREENING.

 

 

Cervical Neoplasia: Pyramid of Diagnoses in the United States

 

CA 15,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Problem of 2,000,000 HPV

Infections Annually in the US

 

We can now screen very sensitively so the issue

Of reassurance (negative predictive value) is technically “solved”, but the issue of  positive predictive value is not

We need to know what to do for women who screen positive, to prevent morbidity from excessive referrals, over-treatment, etc.

Histologic confirmation of CIN 1 is very problematic (see Cox and Guido presentations)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks again to my many collaborators.

 

 

 


 

Regresar a www.cealgin.com